<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>David Weaver Photography &#187; Equipment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weaver.net/blog/category/equipment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weaver.net/blog</link>
	<description>Fine &#38; Diverse Imagery</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 07:07:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New Scanner &#8211; CanoScan 9000F</title>
		<link>http://weaver.net/blog/2010/09/new-scanner-canoscan-9000f/</link>
		<comments>http://weaver.net/blog/2010/09/new-scanner-canoscan-9000f/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 07:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Equipment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weaver.net/blog/?p=238</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Clients can bring about upgrades. I have a small restoration job and that means using a scanner.   I had an old Microtek and old HP scanner but they are no longer supported under Vista 64 nor Win7.  They sit in boxes marked donate to Goodwill.   I gave up restoration jobs a few years ago [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clients can bring about upgrades. I have a small restoration job and that means using a scanner.   I had an old Microtek and old HP scanner but they are no longer supported under Vista 64 nor Win7.  They sit in boxes marked donate to Goodwill.   I gave up restoration jobs a few years ago when some company started an off-shore India photo restoration business and charged customers about 1/200th of my rate.  I think they went out of business as I can&#8217;t find a current reference to them &#8211; ah&#8230;the Internet business world.</p>
<p>Looking for scanner reviews is tough.  Scanners don&#8217;t come out often and there are not a lot of current review sites.  CNET&#8217;s most recent scanner review was dated 2007.</p>
<p>I bought a Canon Canoscan 9000F.  This may finally replace my very old Polaroid film scanner (which has been sitting in a box with it&#8217;s SCSI card for 3 years).  Haha.</p>
<p>Here are the reviews that swayed me:</p>
<p><a href="http://blog.shutterbug.com/davidbrooks/preview_new_canoscan_9000f_silverfast/" target="_blank">http://blog.shutterbug.com/davidbrooks/preview_new_canoscan_9000f_silverfast/</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.imaging-resource.com/SCAN/CS9000/9000F.HTM#con" target="_blank">http://www.imaging-resource.com/SCAN/CS9000/9000F.HTM#con</a></p>
<p>I bought it at Buy.com.  it was $221.87 with free shipping.   I&#8217;m sure it will be cheaper by Christmas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://weaver.net/blog/2010/09/new-scanner-canoscan-9000f/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glass I Use Regularly</title>
		<link>http://weaver.net/blog/2009/07/glass-i-use-regularly/</link>
		<comments>http://weaver.net/blog/2009/07/glass-i-use-regularly/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 21:56:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Equipment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://weaver.net/blog/?p=56</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>This is a mini &#8220;what is in my bag post&#8221;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m tough on gear.  Between all my bodies I click about 60 to 80-thousand shutter releases a year.  I currently shoot with Nikon D300 bodies.  I have 3.  Two of them are with me all the time and I have a backup [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a mini &#8220;what is in my bag post&#8221;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m tough on gear.  Between all my bodies I click about 60 to 80-thousand shutter releases a year.  I currently shoot with Nikon D300 bodies.  I have 3.  Two of them are with me all the time and I have a backup when I need to send one off to Nikon repair.  The &#8216;spare&#8217; is currently dedicated to a Sigma 8mm lens and that whole rig is attached to a Nodal Ninja pano rig and it&#8217;s set up for doing pano photography.  That rig is NOT part of my day bag.</p>
<p>My main numero uno glass is a Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8 lens DX.  I shoot 80% of my shots with this lens.  It is a great and very sharp lens.  I use this lens over the Nikon 17-55mm because it seems as sharp wide open.  It does have fewer aperture blades which is not a bother wide open (or even stopped down for me), and I can hose (break) 3 of these lenses for the price of the Nikon.  I like this lens so much that I own two for when I need to send one in for servicing.  Did I mention that I&#8217;m tough on gear.</p>
<p>My second most used lens  is a Tokina DX 11-16mm f/2.8 wide zoom.  I generally shoot this at 11mm but sometimes zoom it to 16mm.   I can&#8217;t remember shooting this at any in-between zoom setting.  It&#8217;s either 11 or 16mm for me. I have used this lens so much that I took it into Precision Camera (where I bought it in Austin) to get them to tighten up the front mount ring that had worked loose from use &#8211;  the lens is only 6 months old, but I&#8217;m tough on gear.<br />
I bought the Tokina lens to supplement, my Nikon 10.5mm DX fisheye lens.  This Tokina lens gets me thousands more shots in the field over the 10.5mm DX Nikon.  Now, that I have the Sigma 8mm I rarely use the Nikon 10.5 lens for fisheye work.  I do like the 10.5mm as it is small and fits well in a pocket or bag.  I don&#8217;t ever put the Sigma 8mm in my pocket.</p>
<p>The third lens I keep in my bag and I shoot with a lot is a Nikon 80-400mm VR lens.  This is somewhat compact (aka: fits in the bag).  This lens is a ton lighter than the Sigma 120-300 f/2.8 lens I own.  The Siggy is super bight and super sharp but it is a big lens and doesn&#8217;t suit me for most of my daily work.  The Nikon telephoto isn&#8217;t the fastest at zooming but I don&#8217;t find that a bother and it does a fine job in low light.  The VR is essential as I hand-hold this lens about 90% of the time.  I  get solid results in very low light with the ISO cranked up and the shutter set at 1/200  with the lens zoomed out to 400mm. (effective 600mm on the DX sensor).</p>
<p>So two camera bodies.  One with the Tamron 17-55mm f/2.8 on one body all the time.  One body with the Tokina 11-16mm which I will switch out for the Nikon 80-400mm VR.  That way I always have the 17-50mm at hand.</p>
<p>Recap:<br />
Tamron 17-50mm f/2.8<br />
Tokina DX 11-16mm f/2.8<br />
Nikon 80-400mm VR</p>
<p>That&#8217;s my day bag glass.</p>
<p>Opps.  I forgot to include strobes.  I generally have a SB-800 on the camera with the 17-50mm.  <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">I sometime pack and use the SB-900 but that&#8217;s just more weight to add to the bag.</span> Nowadays, I&#8217;m using the SB-900 with the Tokina 11-16 lens. I&#8217;m not a big fan of the SB-900.  If I take the SB-900 with me I will always take the SB-800 as a backup.   I&#8217;ll leave the SB-900 issues for a future post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://weaver.net/blog/2009/07/glass-i-use-regularly/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

