No Summer School

July 21st, 2010 by David Weaver No comments »
A tilled bean field shot while I was NOT enrolled in Summer classes.

A tilled bean field shot while I was NOT enrolled in Summer classes.

I’m so happy I didn’t take Summer courses.  I may take some next year and I may still do one of those wacky 15-day intersession courses.

There are few things I’m happy about.

Being able to travel and shoot for myself.  This included starting up a workshop and scouting locations in the beautiful Northern Nevada high plains.

Saving up money for Fall tuition is important.

Not having to constantly switch between being a student and being a pro-photographer as I do when I’m working and attending classes.

I have to go back to my days in grade school where my friends and I would look forward to starting the next year of school.  The break makes me a bit nostalgic for going back to school.  If I had taken Summer courses I would still be excited about the classes I’m heading for this Fall semester but it might also be some continuation of the grind of schoolwork.

There is some unneeded rationalization here that follows the line of taking it slower makes me learn more and learn it deeper – that may be true, or not.

I will not be qualified as soon as I originally planned, but for me, plans are just that and subject to change.

Overall, it’s a good thing to take a little more time for me, save up a little cash, spend a little more time with friends (which actually means spending more time working as most of my friends are out of town on vacations) and get excited about Fall courses at AAU.

REVIEW: PH 608: Lighting

June 15th, 2010 by David Weaver No comments »
One of my final images in lighting.

One of my final images in lighting.

This class was a disappointment.

I have some more about that in another post here.

The review here isn’t going to discuss the person that was supposed to teach this course.  I’m going to stick to the curriculum.

I’ve also been told this class is being revised so I can only speak to the course I took in Spring ’10. This course seems to take an in-person studio class and turns it online without much consideration to the differences between on-site and online courses.

The videos are very boring and do a barely adequate job in demonstrating most of the concepts that want to be taught.  The videos and the bulk of the course material and the course assignments are targeted towards studio photographers and the generally larger and more expensive lights and light modifying tools that studio photographers use.

The course requires studio strobes, light modifiers, gels, and an incident light meter.   However, the bulk of the assignments can be done with small hotshoe strobes.  The exception here would be a large softbox but there are rigs that can use 2,3 or more hotshoe flashes to light a large softbox.  True, you lose the modeling light capabilities but the use of LCD screens on DSLRs and computer to camera tethered solutions make more sense and would be very helpful in teaching the building up of lighting for a scene.

The incident light meter is fine and useful, yet most students are using DSLRs and learning how to read histograms for high and low-key lighting and how to use the in-camera reflective meter in difficult lighting situations seems more useful than the 250 bucks spent on an infrequently used Sekonic.

The basics of lighting apply from small desktop sets to large staged productions.  Only a fraction of photographers become F/T studio-only photographers and this course would greatly benefit from covering a much wider gamut of shooting situations.

I can and did get more value out of a $45 Scott Kelby book/DVD on lighting and I could see teaching a class using that as a course supplement.  I also recommend Joe McNally’s “Hot Shoe Diaries” to those with a bit of lighting experience.  If you are interested in lighting I can also suggest the free courses on Strobist.

Again, the online version of this course as I took it in Spring ’10 is not recommended…Strongly not recommended.

REVIEW: PH 613: Color Theory for Photographers

June 15th, 2010 by David Weaver 1 comment »
One of my final images in Color.

One of my final images in Color.

This course is required as part of the MFA-Photography degree …at least it was this semester!

I have heard from a program director that this course is undergoing revision so I can only discuss my experience in the Spring ‘10 section I took with professor Marc Ullom.

I learned a LOT in this class. I have never had any formal training in color and color theory and I now know why someone with red hair looks good in green from a technical perspective. I also found that I was creating images that I would have never attempted if I wasn’t studying color. I didn’t find this class hard, rather I seemed to be in a discovery mode in this class and every week was another mini-adventure in color and photography.   There are some difficult aspects.  If you had PH612: the Nature of Photography then you touched on plasticity.  In this course you will get some more face time with this difficult concept.  The modules in this class spend a lot of time discussing the exceptional work done by Johannes Itten on color theory.  After a few weeks into the semester I decided that instead of reading about what Itten wrote about I should be reading what Itten wrote and I bought Itten’s famous book “The Art of Color” so I could actually read directly from the master.

I was not disappointed.  If this is not yet a required book in future semesters you should get a copy of this book to supplement your reading.  It is a splendid book and a wonder to read, review, and reread.  It should be in every artists’ collection.  Sure, it is expensive but it is a fraction of the cost of tuition and you will likely find yourself going back and reading parts of this book over many years to come.

The other thing I found useful was a color wheel.  These are pretty cheap and found at most art stores and online.

I also found that using some online color wheels to be very useful in determining if images would well-fit with the weekly assignment.

http://colorschemedesigner.com/

http://ficml.org/jemimap/style/color/wheel.html

Marc Ullom is a great professor.  I had him last semester for PH 601: Photography-Concept and really enjoyed the feedback and encouragement I saw him give to me and other students.   He seemed even more attentive this semester and I greatly enjoyed his encouragement to play and experiment.  I worked to create some very abstract images for this class.  This was intended to push myself to do something completely new and it forced my attention on color and the relationships of color without having to bother with neither literal subjects nor narrative.  This was so interesting that I’m considering continuing with this for my thesis.


REVIEW: GS 625: History of Photography

June 15th, 2010 by David Weaver No comments »

 

My take a photo inspired by Karl Blossfeldt.

My photo inspired by Modernist photographer Karl Blossfeldt.

This class kicked my ass.  I kicked it back harder.

I’ve now taken 5 courses as AAU.  Two classes last semester (Fall ’09) and three courses this semester (Spring’10).  This is my first GS class.  It was tough and challenging and fun and I learned a lot.  I learned a lot about history and re-learned and greatly improved my ability to write papers at a Master’s level.

The course is a comprehensive review of the history of photography from the early pre-photography developments that led to photography to both technological and historical influences that drove photography and photographic movements from the 1800’s to modern day. There are papers due almost every week, plus a midterm and final project and papers also due during those times as well.  If you suck at footnoting get the “Documenting Sources in MLA style: 2009 Update – A Hacker Handbooks Supplement, you should be able to find a copy online.  Also use a citation service.  I found http://www.bibme.org/ to be very useful.  Using the citations/references features in Word ‘07 and greater is also highly useful.  I found myself spending almost as much time on citations as I did writing the body of the papers.

This is a required class and when you take it you should take David Arnold as your instructor.

I’m sure there are other qualified instructors at AAU. My experience in almost all the undergraduate and graduate courses, workshops and other seminars is the teacher makes the class. Online is different from in-person and this professor made me want to constantly participate and do additional non-required research and deepen my understanding of history and related photographers and subjects.  I wanted to read more, buy more books, study more artists and other photographers.  I started this course thinking “ oh well…this is required and I’ll have to read and can probably work hard enough to get an A”. I ended this course with “wow!  What great material, look at how much more I don’t know now that I’ve learned something about the history of photography, what an excellent course!

In my review of the course to the department I said something like, ‘when I teach I want to teach like this class is taught’.

As I strongly believe that instructors are the critical link between material and learning I am taking a course this Fall ’10 in Experimental Photography being taught by David Arnold.  This is so outside my normal and fairly wide comfort zone.  I’m really looking forward to playing and learning a lot in that class this Fall!

BTW: I earned an A in this class, but it was a lot of work.  I probably spent 15-25 hours a week just on this course.

The Demotivating Bad Class

June 15th, 2010 by David Weaver No comments »
The lowest grade in my lighting class went to this image.  :-)

The lowest grade in my lighting class went to this image. : -)

It was bound to happen.

I took a class and the experience was abysmal, dreadful, and appallingly bad.  It would be easy enough to pan a course and an instructor but that won’t do a good job explaining my perceptions during the semester.

Lighting is an elective course. It was my first elective course at AAU and I can’t recommend it.  My experience here gives it a solid D-minus.  Tamara Hubbard , Associate Director of Online photography MFA, and I had a dialog concerning issues surrounding both the course and the person assigned to teach it. Three points stood out from this discussion:

  1. I may have been over-qualified to take this course.
  2. The course is being revised.
  3. The instructor issues have been noted and I should additionally contact another Director to follow-up.

For the first point: I don’t agree. I am an experienced photographer but I only do a little studio work and I really wanted to take something that I knew I was good at but would greatly improved my skills and knowledge of the subject by taking this elective.  Other classes I’ve taken had students with a huge range of abilities from poor to excellent yet it seemed that most students that applied themselves did really good work and improved personally over the duration of the term.  The director did encourage me to contact her directly about future course suggestions which I find to be very commendable.

Second: So the course is being revised.  This means that I do not recommend the PH608: Lighting class I took in Spring 2010.  It also means I cannot make any judgments on any revised course until I see the new course material.

Third:  The MFA-Photography AAU folks do occasional online town hall meetings.  I haven’t attended one but one of my fellow students did and her takeaway was that if you have particular issues with a class then contact a director.  I didn’t want to be a whiny student so I contact a couple other students in my class, and I discovered that the issues I had were also held by some other students as well.  One of the students actually met face-to-face with one of the directors and did voice concerns about the course and instructor.  This made my follow up easier as all I had to do was validate how I and the other student felt and I could be contacted for additional information.

Being able to document and criticize (both positively and negatively) is very important when praising a course/instructor.  Being able to easily communicate that to the directors of the program speaks highly to the department’s desire to build and maintain a strong program.

This is my second Master’s.  I draw on my experience as an MBA student where I went into a class and didn’t like the instructor or the material and I would change my courses to reflect that.  As an online student I have to remind myself that I am the master of my schedule and education, therefore I need to be informed about my classes and take action when I feel there are serious problems with a class.

The worst thing about the lighting class wasn’t the waste of money, nor the waste of time – the worst aspect of that class was the incredible de-motivation felt by this student which drove me to do mediocre work in a class I was initially very excited about taking.

The best thing that came out of this class was learning that the department appears to really care about the program, the course, and the quality of the instructors.


[UPDATE 6/17: I've learned that the person that taught my section is also teaching at least one Summer section - email me if you want to know the instructor (or go find another post). I have (for better or worse) suggested to a former classmate to drop that class or find another instructor  that is teaching it. It is that bad a class in my personal opinion]

Answering THE question

June 14th, 2010 by David Weaver No comments »
Answering Questions

Answering Questions


I’ve got lots to write about the next few days. But, I just got this email from a gal named Stacy and wanted to respond.  This is the ultimate question…and the answer is rather complex.

Read what Stacey wrote me and then my response.

Hi David!

My name is Stacey and I came across your blog about going for your MFA with AAU. I am currently looking at AAU for the same program (i live in san francisco, but am open to in person or online program) and your blog is one of the first positive (and informative/not only talking about a real estate scam) opinions i have come across on the web. of course, most of the posting i read are done by younger students or undergraduates that have certain expectations paying for a class and receiving a good grade because of it, etc and have not had a professional career before attending the school.

My question to you is – can you give me your honest opinion (as you are a professional) of the program and the professors? Has it, so far, been worth your time and money? How do you think they stack up in comparison to programs like RISD or SAIC? How is the online course program? I don’t have my own darkroom, etc…Just my Nikon d60 and 35mm f 2.8/35mm Nikkor (in addition to my macbook and adobe suite/capture one of course). what other types of equipment was necessary to have for the online courses?

The graduate admissions counselor is very nice, albeit a bit vague on certain details and the financial aid counselor i spoke to was not helpful, informative and just a bit smarmy, so i’m doing that research on my own.

I know you are extremely busy, but any thoughts about this program would be really helpful and most appreciated.

Thanks!!


There is a lot to say here. Some subjects deserve and will get further treatment in upcoming posts.  Let me try a short answer here and let me add a few things for thought.

I’ve just finished up my second semester.  I took 3 classes.  Two were outstanding classes taught by outstanding people that want to teach and have students do well.  One class was so poorly taught (calling it taught does disservice to the word) that I was highly motivated to do intentionally mediocre work, and I had a dialog with the director’s of the program concerning the course. (Yes I will write about this soon).

So Stacey, and everyone else, let me address your points.

There is little information about the program available outside the program.  There are those (often whiny) pages on Yelp.  (see my notes on AAU Reviews). I’ve created this blog because I wanted to share my experiences and feelings while working on my MFA-Photography to help fill the void of personal perspectives.

People complain more than they praise.  If I can recall something from my MBA course work in marketing is that complaints will often outnumber praise from 1:10 to 1:500 and that negative opinions will more dramatically impact a reference than a positive opinion.  Think about it, when was the last time you told someone of a good customer experience and rather found yourself telling a tale about some schmuck or awful company or service or shoddy product?   So there is a lot of negative feedback about AAU and a lot of it comes from whiny undergraduate students.   I consider most of that just noise. Some students have some romantic notion about being an artist and feel that getting a BFA or MFA is the ticket to validating that.  That’s a load of crap.  The program is expensive for better or worse. While there is a lot to learn and I mostly greatly enjoy what I’m learning having an BFA or MFA does not make you an artist.  It means you have taken a program in ART and have passed the requirements spelled out by the program.  What exactly is a professional career as an artists anyway?  It’s likely different for everyone.

Two additional issues here.  One is related to the above  – There is a gap between the perceptions of an MFA and the expectations of the degree.  I’ll argue that most students expect more from the degree than the actual perception after they are in a program and this likely extends after one gets the degree.

The other issue here is that AAU is a for-profit educational institution. Basically, money and other resources are inputs and educated students and profits are the outputs.  I haven’t done the research to see what percentage of tuition comes from government loans (there is a limit).  For-profit education firms can be mills that mine heavily for student loans.  Let’s just say I have a little experience in seeing a couple companies do this.  One did a good job and was really well-balanced between admitting qualified students and taking their student loan money and another company where sales quotas drove lots of unqualified people and a few qualified folks into an educational hamster-wheel.

So, AAU wants your money and wants to educate you.  It is up to you to determine if you are qualified to COMPLETE a program – anyone can start a program.  AAU admits 100% of applicants that meet the basic requirements. A portfolio review is part of the process, but I have seen such poor work by some students that I have to really question the validity of the portfolio review as a culling method in the admission process.  However, being able to but together a portfolio is a task unto itself and does show some level of motivation from the prospective student.

These points should cover both MFAs and BFAs.

Strictly for MFA-Photography, the last time I checked, AAU appears to have the monopoly on online MFA-Photography programs.  I’ll leave that for you think about.

Stacey, you mention paying for grades.  My experience , so far, is that is not done.  You may get a C (or worse) for doing substandard work but getting an A is not an easy thing to do and I’ve found those courses that have solid educational rigor and good instructors make getting an ‘A’ a demanding task. (4 of my 5 classes fit this description!)

Let me try to answer the meaty part.  I am professional photographer with a lot of experience in certain areas of the field and with well-grounded personal expectations of what and why I am getting my MFA.  In 1994 I completed my first Master’s program (MBA) and I taught at The University of Texas at Austin.  This gives me an unusual perspective as a student.    With the exception of one class in the Spring ’10 term I have found my classes to be challenging and splendid opportunities to explore, play, and get out of my comfort zone in photography.  I am driven to excel and I have to do my best work.  In the 4 classes that have challenged me I have received all A grades.  In the poor class, here is an excerpt of what I sent in during the course evaluation near the end of the semester:

What was the best thing about this instructor? Nothing.  The person (as it is inappropriate to call him an instructor nor professor) should not be allowed to teach until he has taken some teaching classes.  he is not a teacher.  He is babysitting 8 students and judging them instead of getting them to learn.

I got more from a $45 Scott Kelby lighting CD than I did from the instructor.

You ask “Did the instructor provide feedback…” To which I answer the instructor did not provide quality feedback.  His judgments (reviews) of assignments are highly inconsistent and do not foster any appreciable learning.

You ask “Was the instructor approachable for questions and assistance in class?” To which I answer do I pull up to a traffic signal and wait for it turn green?  Does he answer questions?  Sure, but does he answer specific questions about student work.  No.

Does he foster a learning environment? No.

Let’s talk about RISD and SAIC and lots of the other art schools around.   Would I love to get into RISD.  Yup!  Art Institute?  You bet! Brooks Institute?  Sure!  Art Studio at UT-Austin?  Why not!

Could I really leave Austin and go attend class in-person at some notable art school?  Realistically, no.  Can I give up the contacts and the community I continue to build here in Austin to go study full-time in another market? Nope, it doesn’t work for me right now.

Getting my MFA is a deeply personal decision with some future real world consequences.  I’ve been shooting for 40 years, first published 30 years ago and I have a strong desire to do and grow my art, my business, and to teach both art and business to artists.  This is the right thing to do…for me.

If I were you, I’d be investigating where else you might want to attend.  Look at lots of programs at lots of institutions.  You have Brooks down the road in Santa Barbara.  AFI down in LA, and other alternatives in the Bay Area.    If I were you, I’d also need to understand my drive and desire to succeed, and my ability to move, work, family, and all the other issues that play into the complex decision of where to go.

Does that help?

The admissions folks are nice but they are recruiters.  I’ll bet they have certain numbers to meet as well.

Don’t do financial aid.  Pay for it yourself.  It will mean more to you as you take a class and you will understand the value of your work to pay for the additional education.  Do this for at least a year.  By then you will have decided if this is the right thing for you to do.  If you are going to complete a program (anywhere) then thinking about financial aid seems reasonable. for the last year or so.  If you decide it is not for you then you owe nothing going forward and can more favorably look back at that experience.

To wrap up this post:  At this time I’ll I am very happy with my overall experiences at AAU in my goal to obtain my MFA in Photography.